There is a process that has been used to challenge a “local council”, that so far, appears to have been very successful.
It’s a process of sending 3 documents: Notice of Conditional Acceptance, followed by a Notice of Default and then finalised in law, with a Letter of Estoppel. A Fee Schedule should also be included.
The documents must be in the correct format, and all 3 Notices must be sent for the process to have any chance of being effective. There are NO GUARANTEES that others may have the same success. Many years of research and learning about legalities and law allowed me to get a decent grasp on what systems they have put in place, and how those systems, entities, processes get away with what they do. Basically, they get away with it because they have not been challenged using a language they acknowledge. Lex Mercatoria invokes Common Law, and when used in formally written Notices, excellent results have been achieved.
Friday 4th November 2022.
The documents are now available from the Private Members Association beta website launched at https://www.thecommonwealthofaustralia.com.au/
Quo Warranto
“In old English practice. A writ, in the nature of a writ of right for the king, against him who claimed or usurped any office, franchise, or liberty; to inquire by what authority he supported his claim, in order to determine the right It lay also in case of non-user, or long neglect of a franchise, or misuser or abuse of it; being a writ commanding the defendant to show by what warrant he exercises such a franchise, having never had any grant of it or having forfeited it by neglect or abuse. 3 Bl. Comm. 262. In England, and quite generally throughout the United States, this writ has given place to an “Information in the nature of a quo warranto,” which, though in form a criminal proceeding, is in effect a civil remedy similar to the old writ, and is the method now usually employed for trying the title to a corporate or other franchise, or to a public or corporate office.”
Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd edition
In a nutshell – they must PROVE their authority back to the Crown. If they are collecting money/rates/fees/etc that are supposedly for the “Government” which is supposedly working for the Commonwealth, which is headed up by, now, King Charles III, then they MUST provide evidence they are a bona fide creditor of the Commonwealth under the Crown.
For now I will just share a copy of documents used for an “Infringement”. The exact same process with almost identical wording has been used now by several people, and all of those “Infringements” have “gone away”. HOWEVER, there is more to it than just sending the documents!
You MUST understand (“understand” [agreeing to contract] is a word I must avoid but I want to get this out quickly!), you MUST comprehend what the documents say, AND who you are, AND that any future interactions will be on your terms. You can only do that once you are confident in who you are, and you probably don’t know at this stage, that you are not who you thought you were. More on that later.
Back to the Notices to Council.
I have not yet, but will, be sending them another letter (not a Notice) and I will be offering a contribution towards services provided eg. rubbish removals and emergency services etc. The content of that letter could be included in your Estoppel, and mine would read along the lines…
However, now that all previous Contracts and Obligations have been terminated, I am willing to contribute to services provided by SHIRE OF ABC ABN 12 345 678 901 (the business), $x/yr. I shall be willing to contribute a more substantial contribution once the SHIRE OF ABC ABN 12 345 678 901 is replaced with a true Council of The People, who represents The People, is reinstated pursuant to our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, and is a true Commonwealth entity, of and For The People.
Upon reflection, as much as we want this information shared, it MUST be understood before using it. To not have a firm grasp on every part of the documents is likely to get people into more trouble than not. For that reason we will be launching a Private Members Club, so that members will be able to share Zoom nights, ask questions, see and write documents in a small closed group, so that, hopefully, anyone using the documents will know exactly what they are doing and how to move forward.
We have 1000% confidence in the documents, we just need to make sure that anyone using them succeeds. If used correctly, they will succeed. Releasing the documents publicly will undoubtedly see people getting into strife, and that is what we do not want.