It’s a long journey, but if you choose to take it, you can be set free. Understanding (a very bad word, in law you should not stand under anyone or thing) how (and why) the “laws” have been created, not to protect people but to CONTROL people, Permits, registrations, fees, charges don’t protect people, they control them, and make revenue for the controllers.
Language is extremely important.
eg. Western Australia Constitution Act 1889 s “75. Interpretation – Person includes a corporation or association of persons.
The “person” was created through the Birth Certificate. It is the sole corporate entity through which you are contracted into the system of administration. The living man or woman was documented with the Live Birth Record (different names in different states/countries), but several days later, the “Government” created the sole corporate entity with the Birth Certificate. You then became a “person”.
You can (or could) get a white paper copy or certified copy of your Live Birth Record from the Department of Births, deaths and Marriages in the state you were born. If they say they don’t know what you’re talking about, ask to speak to the supervisor, they know.
The definition of “person” has been edited in recent times, and archives removed of older versions of the definition.
The Black’s Law Dictionary “was” the go to, but it’s record has been removed for the definition of “person”.
The Mirriam Webster version, now buries the corporate entity on line 6:
“6 : one (such as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties”
“Legal Definition of legal person
: a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and especially the capacity to sue and be sued”
“Legal Definition of natural person
: a human being as distinguished from a person (as a corporation) created by operation of law”
There are many teachers to follow. All can help “join the dots”. Once you have the full picture the “show” becomes very clear.
Tim Dwyer – the Clearfield Doctrine
Watch it on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3WuZmPB8GS7D/
Tim Dwyer – Land taxes/rates
Watch it on BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Gax_qKiUD4U/
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
5. Operation of the Constitution and laws.
This Act, and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution, shall be binding on the courts, judges, and people of every State and of every part of the Commonwealth, notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State; and the laws of the Commonwealth shall be in force on all British ships, the Queen’s ships of war excepted, whose first port of clearance and whose port of destination are in the Commonwealth.
Not the Parliament of the “Australian Government“
58. Royal assent to Bills.
When a proposed law passed by both Houses of the Parliament is presented to the Governor-General for the Queen’s assent, he shall declare, according to his discretion, but subject to this Constitution, that he assents in the Queen’s name, or that he withholds assent, or that he reserves the law for the Queen’s pleasure.
Recommendations by Governor-General.
The Governor-General may return to the house in which it originated any proposed law so presented to him, and may transmit therewith any amendments which he may recommend, and the Houses may deal with the recommendation.
See notes on Oath (bottom of page) which compare the Oath according to our Constitution, and the Oath taken by a currently serving “Police Officer”.
69. Transfer of certain departments.
On a date or dates to be proclaimed by the Governor‑General after the establishment of the Commonwealth the following departments of the public service in each State shall become transferred to the Commonwealth:—
Posts, telegraphs, and telephones:
Naval and military defence:
Lighthouses, lightships, beacons, and buoys:
Quarantine.
But the departments of customs and of excise in each State shall become transferred to the Commonwealth on its establishment.
92. Trade within the Commonwealth to be free.
On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.
But notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, goods imported before the imposition of uniform duties of customs into any State, or into any Colony which, whilst the goods remain therein, becomes a State, shall, on thence passing into another State within two years after the imposition of such duties, be liable to any duty chargeable on the importation of such goods into the
Commonwealth, less any duty paid in respect of the goods on their importation.
117. Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
OATH.
I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD !
Currently serving “Police Officer’s” Oath:
OATH OF OFFICE – POLICE OFFICER
I……………………DO SWEAR – THAT – I WILL WELL AND TRULY SERVE – OUR SOVEREIGN LADY THE QUEEN – AS A POLICE OFFICER WITHOUT FAVOUR OR AFFECTION – MALICE OR ILL-WILL – UNTIL I AM LEGALLY DISCHARGED – THAT I WILL SEE AND CAUSE – HER MAJESTY’S PEACE TO BE KEPT AND PRESERVED – AND THAT – I WILL PREVENT TO THE BEST OF MY POWER – ALL OFFENCES AGAINST THAT PEACE – AND THAT – WHILE I CONTINUE TO BE A POLICE OFFICER – I WILL – TO THE BEST OF MY SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE – DISCHARGE ALL THE DUTIES THEREOF – FAITHFULLY – ACCORDING TO LAW.
SO HELP ME GOD.See s58 Royal Assent to Bills, “that he assents in the Queen’s name” – is that “our Sovereign lady the Queen” as per the “Queen of Australia” via the Australia Act 1986? Because it isn’t in the name of the Queen, Queen Elisabeth II, her heirs or successors “by name”.
And by the same interpretation, the currently serving “Police Officers” could be guilty of impersonating an Officer of the Law, a punishable crime (Crimes Act 1914).